Where does the budget process in Texas stand at this time? The Texas House passed a budget with various cuts, and identified a need for using 3.1B of the Rainy Day Fund. This proposal then went to the Senate. The Senate has their own budget proposal. It spends 12B more than the House Proposal. This budget process is going to end up in conference.
When the House and Senate offer two different solutions to the same bill, the legislation then moves to a committee made up of some members of the House and Senate. Their job is to negotiate a solution which satisfies the legislature as a final solution. In this instance, there will be debates about where to cut money and how much.
Mr. Talmadge Heflin, of the Texas Public Policy Foundation identified 3 priorities for the legislature with regard to the budget for the next biennium. Go to this site for more info on the House and Senate budgets: http://www.texaspolicy.com/legislativeupdates_single.php?report_id=3719
There are 3 things that lead to logical solutions on the budget.
- Make the necessary cuts
- Don’t raise taxes
- Don’t use the Rainy Day Fund
The Senate chose to disregard the advice of economists, experts, the Governor and the people of Texas. They have elected to spend more money when they are fully aware of the unfunded mandates the state is facing in 2013. New sources of money were used by the Senate to help pay for some of their programs, but it does not solve the future problem.
Before Texas gets into dire straits, there must be austerity measures taken in the state. In the past year, Americans have witnessed many states teetering on the verge of bankruptcy trying to make quick fixes. Several states have bond ratings now in jeopardy of a downgrade, due to excessive spending. Is this what we want for Texas?
Please call your legislators and state clearly the need for fiscal restraint prior to the emergency! Let’s show the rest of the country how it’s done.
As a final thought of what to say to the legislators: We pay you to be smart and do the very best for the citizens that elected you to office. Show you have the integrity and character to do what is best for Texans.
- Get rid of duplicity across departments
- Freeze all discretionary spending for two years
- Freeze hiring in all departments of the state for two years.
Congressman Henry Waxman (Dem) was elected to Congress in 1974. He is up for re-election in 2010.
There are volumes about this man and what he has done in the government since 1974. I will attempt to touch on the most salient points, as I found him to be one of many “blights” we are seeing in the American government today. Representative Waxman has moved residence 3 different times in his career and has been elected in three different voting districts. He has sponsored 149 bills in his career and 6 have passed. The primary watchdog groups in the country have rated him as being consistently far left in his views.
Representative Waxman has worked with the Apollo Institute to generate the Cap N Trade Bill. People reported on the ideas of the Apollo Group for economic recovery and Cap N Trade as far back as 2003. Evidence can be found of this. The bills that were passed by the Congress are almost identical to the left wing lobbyist ideas to be found on the Apollo Institute website.
Who is the Apollo Institute? They are an organization made up of various unions in the country and other special interest groups gathered under the umbrella of Apollo Institute. One of the many left wing financial supporters Apollo Institute is the Joyce Foundation. This is the group often associated with trying to get rid of the people’s right to bear arms. There are numerous known Marxists and Socialists who support the Institute. The Apollo Institute claims to be a non-profit and is owned by the Tides Corporation. These are the people who produced the indoctrination video that was purchased by over 7,000 schools. The film taught the children that capitalism is bad for the people of America. Do you know who will benefit from the Cap N Trade Bill that was designed primarily by the Apollo Institute? Their board members consist of people who own heavy interests in alternative energy companies and in companies that produce the components for solar energy. The majority of their members are the 17 largest unions in the country and the major lobbyists in the US.
There are two obvious questions to ask. What is in it for all the unions? What is their real end goal in getting their goals accomplished? What did they get out of the American Recovery Act and what will they get from the Cap N Trade? What was in it for Representative Henry Waxman to do their bidding on two major pieces of legislation (Healthcare bill HR3200 before Congress and the Cap N Trade Bill)?
The small business groups have rated Congressman Waxman in the lower percentile groups throughout his career. He does not favor small entrepreneurial enterprises in his legislative votes. Clearly his allegiance is to the labor groups and lobbyists if one looks at his overall record on voting and his public speeches. The American Taxpayer group has rated his performance an F most recently and very low in prior years. Representative Waxman has voted to spend more money and grow government at every opportunity regardless of the state of the economy. The conglomerate of lobbyists and unions has the ear of Henry Waxman , more than the people of the United States.
He was a co-author of legislation that abolished mandatory retirement for Federal employees and raised the retirement age in the private sector from 65 to 70. Please note this increases the time an elderly person must work in most cases. It also does NOT apply to the politicians in the Congress, Senate, and Judiciary that govern all of us.
Representative Waxman voted against the proposed bill to withhold federal funds to ACORN. This organization is being investigated in 14 states for voter fraud. There have also been several covert films made recently that captured the ACORN people advising people on how to handle businesses with underage prostitutes. This man clearly has some kind of motivation to “protect” interests with ACORN.
In 2009, Rep. Waxman became Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The Energy and Commerce Committee has principal responsibility for legislation and oversight in the areas of public health, consumer protection, food and drug safety, air quality, the environment, energy, telecommunications, and interstate and foreign commerce. After all the years of dubious associations, poor judgment, and lavish spending, can Henry Waxman be entrusted with such a powerful position in our legislature?
His allegiances aren’t in the best interest of the people, if you look at his entire record. There is no plausible explanation as to why he would choose to continue to give taxpayer money to an organization under investigation in so many states. Representative Waxman, you have been in office too long. It is time to go!
“If we resort for a criterion to the different principles on which different forms of government are established, we may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior.”
James Madison (Federalist No. 39)
Twitter: Texasfor56Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Congressman Anthony Weiner (Dem), was first elected to the House in 1998. He is up for re-election in 2010.
This Representative has become known for being one of the “point” people on the Healthcare Reform options being considered by the Congress and the Senate.
Weiner Responds To Senate Finance Committee Rejection Of The Public Option
“It should come as no surprise that the Finance Committee rejected the public option amendment offered by Senator Rockefeller”
“After all, the health insurance lobby has won virtually everything it has fought for in the Finance Committee to date.”
“Fortunately, the bill is not being written in the Senate Finance Committee.” “The American people support a public option. Doctors want a public option. The President has said he wants a public option. Without a public option there will be no competition, no cost containment and less choice. That is why it will be part of the bill.”
Polls and newscasts have begun to show the “facts” stated above, in the Senator’s speech, are not true.
Here are some key facts on the Senator’s record:
1) Weiner has been onboard completely with the Obama administration’s lavish economic policies from the beginning.
2) His “good judgment included a request to release a man from prison who had received a life sentence for passing classified information to Israel. Clearly the deed was serious enough to receive this sentence as dictated by the laws of the land, yet Congressman Weiner wanted a “custom” justice mandated for his cause.
3) He touted how much the stimulus plan would “help NYC”. It is now nearly at the end of October 2009. There have not been any new jobs created in the entire state of NY by this bill (per recovery.gov). Given the text of his earlier speech it appears the NYC area will be recipients of entitlements and grants. The entire country (primarily the middle class) will be taxed to pay for NYC initiatives is what this means. People in Brooklyn and Queens (the middle class) will be getting new taxes as well to help pay for the enormous stimulus package. Somehow in the speeches he fails to alert constituents of the tax bill they will be paying for many years due to this law.
4) Most recently, he had blasted the Social Security Administration for not giving a cost of living raise to the elderly. This seemed odd given there was no cost of living increase in the economy this year per statistics. **Remember he is up for election in 2010.
His resume and speeches indicate a person very “hungry” for the power and notoriety that comes with politics. For instance, since the beginning he has touted a special “bond” and support for the middle class. The middle class represents the majority of his New York district. Usually he has attempted to introduce tax cuts for the middle class when it is close to an election year. Yet, he is now proposing a sweeping Healthcare Reform Bill with a public option that would result in a much heavier taxation of the middle class and impose hardships on the elderly. Representative Weiner has been in the “limelight” on the House Floor anytime there is an opporunity to be high profile on pro-Obama administration positions. His speeches for the middle class are visible in every major talk show. This keeps the people back in his District happy because they visibly “see” him saying things in support of them. However, on the floor of the Congress he has has been a strong supporter of virtually every major spending initiative by this administration (which will definitely result in hardship for the middle class). This ensures he will get campaign support on a priority basis from this administration.
Recently in the Congress several amendments were brought forward to “itemize” several Solar studies and projects in the range of hundreds of millions of dollars. May I remind everyone that Exxon Mobil, and all the other oil majors around the world have done exhaustive studies in this area and determined the technology is not there at this time to make this a cost effective solution for America or anyone else. Yet, the Democrats passed all the amendments without flinching spending hundreds of more millions of dollars when the country is deep in debt and in extreme trouble financially. Senator Weiner has made statements that this administration is progressive and “tackling” all the hard issues. So now the politicians believe they can resolve all the issues with solar, regardless of the consistent and numerous results found by other expert studies over the past 5 years. Did I mention that many of the companies who will be recipients of these millions of dollars in funds for studies are heavy Democrat supporters? How convenient as we are approaching another election year for many of the heavyweights in the Democratic party!
So what is real? His desire to help the middle class in election years, or his eagerness to “perform” on camera for the White House? There is a consistency in his voting and numerous speeches on the House Floor. He will support all visible Democrat initiatives regardless of whether it benefits his beloved middle class.
Representative Weiner has been the protégé of Senator Schumer for several years, and is well-known as someone who has full and easy access to all the powerful people in the current administration. From all appearances and from his pattern of behavior this appears to be another “Schumer in training”. Is this really a good thing for the Constitutional Republic? Congressman Weiner has quickly become the “consummate” politician learning how to placate his constituents in a visible manner and be the “popular guy” with the White House. For this adept ability to speak from both sides of his mouth almost simultaneously, Congressman Weiner, it is time to go!
Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on offices, a rottenness begins in his conduct. ~Thomas Jefferson
Representative Charles Rangel (Dem) was first elected in 1970. He is up for re-election in 2010.
He is currently the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, one of the most powerful committees in the House. The job of that committee is to oversee the IRS and the Federal tax code. Representative Rangel has evaded taxes for over a decade and yet pays none of the penalties and interest charges the IRS piles on the average taxpayer for far less serious offenses.
For 16 months he has been investigated on charges of multiple tax, errors in federal disclosure, and ethics violation charges. Most recently, in August 2009 Representative Rangel made new confessions of failure to report nearly a million dollars in assets on federal disclosure forms. The investigation began in July 2008 and has already been expanded twice – before the latest revelations. . The Democratic majority appears to have a difficulty with understanding ethics applies to all parties, as they have voted to have him stay in this position until the investigation is over. How many more “ethical” decisions will this man be making in his role of oversight of the IRS and Federal tax code in the coming months? What does the decision by the majority of the House to overlook this, say about their own ability to be ethical and honest?
This whole situation illustrates there is a double standard alive and well in the House. One standard is for the powerful and rich, and one for the average American. This is an absolute disgrace that the Representative has been permitted to stay as head of this powerful committee dealing with the very laws he has broken.
I refer you to a letter dated May 24, 2006 by the Minority Leader at that time, Nancy Pelosi “cited “high ethical standards” in a letter to Representative William Jefferson asking that he resign his seat on the Committee on Ways and Means in light of ongoing investigations into alleged financial impropriety by Representative Jefferson.
Editorial Note: Minority Leader Pelosi did the right and appropriate action is asking Representative Jefferson to resign the seat on the Committee in light of the investigations. Why did she not instruct Representative Rangel to do the same thing?
In closing, I’d like to share an excerpt from a speech given in February 2008 by Representative Rangel in his role as Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee:
“Our massive trade deficit reflects years of a passive, misguided trade policy by the Bush Administration. Too often, our trading partners are allowed to break international rules, to keep U.S. exports out of their markets, and to engage in unfair trade practices. We need a more assertive approach to the enforcement of our international agreements and trade laws”.
What do we learn from this speech? Chairman Rangel expects lawbreakers to be brought in line via assertive enforcement. Apparently this philosophy does not apply to him.
There are dozens of other examples where Representative Rangel has chosen to disregard the rule of law and the principles of the Constitution. It is pointless to waste time acknowledging or delving into those – as there is no need. He has broken the law repeatedly in a premeditated manner over a decade. Several infractions have been admitted by Representative Rangel. If it were any one of the general population that had committed this type of offense, there would be many penalties and dire consequences to face.
There is no question Representative Rangel, We the people ask you to leave now for the good of the country.
“Our government…teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.”
Louis D. Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice (1856 to 1941)
Twitter: Texasfor56Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Representative Mary Whitaker Bono Mack (Rep) represents California.
She has been in office continuously since 1998 and will be up for re-election in 2010.
There are voting instances in Representative Mack’s voting record that are somewhat disturbing. The primary issues we found with her record are specific to a lack of fiscal responsibility, yet speaking out to the public stating the importance of fiscal responsibility in these harsh economic times.
Voted YES on Cap N Trade in June 2009
Congresswoman Mack represents the great state of California that is bankrupt and suffering from high unemployment rates. Bearing this in mind, she voted yes to a bill incurring high costs to the taxpayers when her state and the entire country are operating in the red. This was fiscally irresponsible to vote yes for the Cap N Trade bill that the experts say will add an equivalent 12-15% tax hike on everyone in her district. This is just a small sample of the spending and further expenses to be paid by the taxpayers of this country:
-Appropriates $600 million for fiscal years 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 respectively to establish the Best in Class Appliances Deployment Program for the following reasons (Sec. 214):
-Appropriates $200 million for fiscal year 2009-2010, $250 million for fiscal year 2010-2011, $300 million for fiscal year 2011-2012, $350 million for fiscal year 2012-2013 and $400 for fiscal year 2013-2014 for the Hollings Manufacturing Partnership Program (Sec. 247).
-Appropriates $15 billion for fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 respectively to establish the Clean Energy Manufacturing Revolving Loan Fund Program for issuing grants to States to issue loans to manufactures for investments in clean energy technology, including, but not limited to, wind turbines, solar energy, fuel cells, biomass equipment, geothermal equipment, advanced biofuels, ocean energy equipment, carbon capture and storage, and advanced batteries, battery systems, or storage devices (Sec. 246).
-Appropriates $2.5 billion to establish the Residential Energy Efficiency Block Grant Program for issuing grants to States, metropolitan cities and urban counties, Indian tribes, and insular areas to carry out energy efficiency improvements in new and existing single-family and multifamily housing (Sec. 296).
-Appropriates $5 billion to the Alternative Energy Sources State Loan Fund established by this Act for the Secretary of Energy to issue loans to states and Indian tribes to provide incentives
Voted YES Housing Bill with Energy Tax Credit Extensions HR 3221
She chose to spend more money yet again.
Increases the national debt limit from $9.82 trillion to $10.62 trillion (Sec. 3083).
-Establishes the Home Ownership Preservation Entity Fund to fund the HOPE (Home Ownership Preservation Entity) for Homeowners Program, which will insure up to $300 billion for 30 year refinanced loans for distressed borrowers between October 1, 2008-September 30, 2011 (Sec. 1402).
Editorial note: Giving loans to unqualified borrowers is what has caused the majority of the housing issue. People should be accountable for their actions, not rewarded for poor judgment. Let them learn the hard lessons so it won’t be repeated . People can live in rental properties until they can afford to do better.
Voted YES for HR1424 – Second Economic Package October 2008
Voted to concur with Senate amendments and pass a bill that allows the Secretary of the Treasury to purchase troubled assets from financial institutions, with a total outstanding balance of up to $700 billion, and also provides tax incentives for alternative energies and contains income tax and alternative minimum tax provisions.
Editorial Note: One would think that this Representative would be especially sensitive to spending as her state is bankrupt (literally).
In her speeches and papers she speaks of fiscal discipline and curtailing spending. Her voting record states otherwise. Please see the speech excerpt below that conflict this action of votes with words:
“Congress must stand for fiscal discipline and reform. I am very concerned about the level of federal spending. One of my top priorities is to reduce unnecessary and wasteful federal spending. It is clear that Congress must work to achieve some balance between the costs that continue to place pressure upon mandatory spending programs and the actual effectiveness of these programs. As we advance in areas like health care, defense, and education, continual changes must be considered that ensure money is spent more efficiently and effectively”.
There are a lot of “nice to have” ideas about the environment, the arts, etc. No one denies this to be true. However, these ideas are not critical at this moment when the country is deeply in debt, unemployment rates are higher than they have been in over 50 years, and people struggle to make house payments. This was irresponsible to vote yes for the Cap N Trade bill that the experts say will add an equivalent 12-15% tax hike on everyone.
This is a matter of priorities and fiscal responsibility. It is time to get back to our country’s foundation as a constitutional republic. Representative Mack, it is time to leave.
Twitter: Texasfor56Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )